CBC Fires Jian Ghomeshi Based On “Information”


Jian Ghomeshi Toronto Star file photo

Let me begin by stating that when it comes to Jian Ghomeshi as a radio host, I can take him or leave him. I’m neither an adoring fan, nor do I have an axe to grind with the former host of CBC’s Q, a program Ghomeshi is credited with co-creating.

Like children in a schoolyard taunting “we know something you don’t know”, the CBC has turfed Ghomeshi without any explanation to taxpaying (ergo CBC supporting) Canadians other than the mysterious “information”.

As I write this Ghomeshi is the former host of Q given the CBC’s decision to fire him yesterday after 14 years with the national broadcaster, eight as host of Q. With that sort of background it must be something horrendous that has provoked the CBC to cut loose one of its brightest lights. In fact they have made this move because of “information” they have received about Ghomeshi. But they’re not saying any more than that. Like children in a schoolyard taunting “we know something you don’t know”, the CBC has turfed Ghomeshi without any explanation to taxpaying (ergo CBC supporting) Canadians other than the mysterious “information”.

Not surprisingly Ghomeshi is firing back by launching a $50 million lawsuit. It seems the CBC wanted him to go quietly; to say he was leaving for personal reasons. But he decided that as he had done nothing wrong he wasn’t going to jump, thereby forcing the CBC to push him.

… suffice to say Jian liked to play a bit of rough but consensual slap and tickle with consenting women.

In a world of social media and virtually instant communication the CBC lost round one when Ghomeshi took to Facebook and posted a long explanation. I won’t go into details here, suffice to say Jian liked to play a bit of rough but consensual slap and tickle with consenting women.  One of his former partners has been on his case and has made this alleged “information” known to the CBC that resulted in the firing.

If she is alleging that things were not always consensual, then it seems to me a court of law is the appropriate place to air her grievances.  And if a court of law determines she was right, then said court should deal with Ghomeshi. But secret bits of “information” are far from being sufficient reason to fire anyone.

Why do we want professional sports leagues and, evidently national broadcasters, to act on allegations before the law deems a person guilty? Is one no longer innocent until proven guilty?

Recently many cases of alleged wrong-doing have spurred calls for the suspensions or firings of several professional athletes. With the exception of accusations that come with video proof, aren’t these people entitled to their day in court? Why do we want professional sports leagues and, evidently national broadcasters, to act on allegations before the law deems a person guilty? Is one no longer innocent until proven guilty?

In the wake of the two tragic deaths of Canadian soldiers on home turf, Canada has been praised for many things, including our openness as illustrated in the desire to keep The House of Commons accessible to all, while still safe. If the CBC does have secret proof of some sort of egregious actions taken by Ghomeshi, it behooves them to make it known or turn it over to the police. But to fire him based on information and hope he will go away is both naive and underhanded.

 

Me DCMontreal – Deegan Charles Stubbs – is a Montreal writer born and raised who likes to establish balance and juxtapositions; a bit of this and a bit of that, a dash of Yin and a soupçon of Yang, some Peaks and an occasional Frean and maybe a bit of a sting in the tail! Please follow DC on Twitter @DCMontreal and on Facebook, and add him on Google+
Advertisements

One thought on “CBC Fires Jian Ghomeshi Based On “Information”

  1. Thank you for this post. I’ve listened to Jian Ghomeshi’s show many times and always thought he has the right questions and right comments.
    Unfortunately so many of us are blinded by media and it’s cloudy and manufactured information. Too many of use repeat what they hear and make it their own opinion without giving it a second thought.
    But when one of ‘us’ opens their mouth and offers a real opinion, it sometimes uncovers truth, that otherwise would remain hidden.
    Jian must have said something ‘wrong’, something that speaks against the mainstream media, and as a result “information” has surfaced. In my opinion this information is likely to be incorrect or warped.
    I didn’t here his last few shows, so i can’t say what that might be. But somehow ‘Dirt’ always seems to appear out of nowhere after one makes a daring comment.
    Freedom of speech is an illusion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s