DCMontreal: Blowing the Whistle on Society

Eclectic social commentary with a chuckle and maybe a sting in the tail

Miley Cyrus nude on the cover of Rolling Stone; just keep that controversy coming!


MileyCyrusRollingStoneTo paraphrase Dr. Hook, “She keeps getting richer, and now she’s got her picture, on the cover of the Rolling Stone”. Once again Miley Cyrus is the focus of heaps of media attention; perhaps it’s more accurate to say she’s still the focus as it never seems to stop. Now the palaver is over her topless photo on the cover of Rolling Stone. Before you abandon this insightful post in search of Ms. Cyrus’ bits and pieces, keep in mind that Rolling Stone, being a reputable publication, has her positioned such that nothing untoward is visible. The strategic placing of her arms and, Viola! all is covered. This brings up the old adage of a tree falling in the forest making noise or not if no one is there to hear it – if a young performer appears topless on a magazine cover but hides the essentials is she topless?

The only bad controversy is the one you’re not at the heart of.

I congratulate Ms. Cyrus and her management team – let’s call it Miley Inc. – on discovering yet again that sex sells. This coupled with another truth – controversy sells, leads to a phenomenon that could be called sexy controversy sells like mad. Think back to Marilyn Monroe’s famous photo with her dress being blown up as she stood on a New York subway vent in the sidewalk. Certainly a classic but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking it was in any way not calculated. Not that Miley is in Marilyn’s league, but it’s the same principle applied to another, more accepting generation – remember it was not all that long ago that the sight of a woman’s ankle raised hackles and, I dare say, other things.

… if a young performer appears topless on a magazine cover but hides the essentials is she topless?

Don’t those who find this offensive understand, no doubt after careful consideration of the evidence, maybe several times to be absolutely certain, that the worst thing they can do is make a fuss about it? Rolling Stone’s recent cover of Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev proved that. It came under fire and was pulled from many stores but still sold more than usual. The only bad controversy is the one you’re not at the heart of.

Logo_3DCMontreal is a Montreal writer born and raised who likes to establish balance and juxtapositions; a bit of this and a bit of that. a dash of Yin and a soupçon of Yang, some Peaks and Freans and maybe a bit of a sting in the tail! Please follow DC on Twitter @DCMontreal and on Facebook, and add him on Google+

Single Post Navigation

2 thoughts on “Miley Cyrus nude on the cover of Rolling Stone; just keep that controversy coming!

  1. There’s really no such thing as bad publicity, is there?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 364 other followers

%d bloggers like this: